Palestras por cientistas eminentes – Lectures by eminent scientists at the University of Algarve

CCMAR

Exmos(as) Senhores(as),

Venho convidá-los para as palestras proferidas pelos professores Sidney Holt
e Daniel Pauly nos dias 28 e 29 de Janeiro no Campus de Gambelas da Universidade do Algarve. Os professores Holt e Pauly são os investigadores que maior influência tiveram na gestão mundial dos recursos marinhos nos últimos 50 anos. As palestras são de entrada livre.

I invite you to the lectures by professors Sidney Holt and Daniel Pauly on January 28th and 29th at Campus de Gambelas, University of Algarve. Professors Holt and Pauly are two of the most influential scientists in the management of the world living marine resources in the last 50 years. Entrance is open to all.

Adelino Canário
Director of CCMAR

Programa / Program

CV – Sidney J. Holt
CV – Daniel Pauly

CCMAR – Centro de Ciências do Mar
Universidade do AlgarveCampus de Gambelas
Edifício 7 – Gabinete 2.87
8005 – 139 FARO
http://ccmar.ualg.pt

The End of Whaling in the Southern Ocean (?!?!)

I recall the message from the pro surfer and environmentalist warrior Dave Rastovich, just days before the 61st International Whaling Commission meeting started in Madeira, Portugal. He ended it by saying that “Honour and respect are nowhere to be found within the modern whaling crime”.

This sentence to me marked that meeting and period, when Japan uses corruption end to meet his aims, with no regard to nature and the livelihood and heritage of the next generations, using resources for profit or stubbornness, if that resources goes extinct, it doesn’t really matter. The IWC61 itself was a big hole full of nothing, and especially big governmental mouths full of empty words and no actions, no resolutions and no whales saved during that meeting.

Mr. Mark Simmonds summed it up very well when he wrote on his blog: “So where were we – ah yes in the gloom of a vast meeting chamber of a big international meeting room where ‘nothing is decided until everything is decided’ … or possibly just ‘nothing is decided’”

I was profoundly sad and as it has been usual during the last period that I’ve attended the IWC and done actions and contributed to the movement devoted to end whaling, I was feeling what I like to call a “post-action depression”. Happens after a very intense period of work and by the end of it nothing has been accomplished. Our struggle was in vain, and it has been since Japan started whaling in the southern ocean sanctuary, to recruit countries to their side, and established a stalemate inside the IWC, meaning that nothing changes year after year.

But some light is shinning ahead, maybe it is a tunnel end, or not…

Humps

In the beginning of the year I wrote an entry titled “And if the crisis would solve the whaling issue?” where I wondered that even though “we cannot really forecast what will happen, and do nothing but wondering about it [while we keep fighting to make whaling history], the fuel prices will fell dramatically, the Japanese whaling industry and hardware is getting old and they been having repeated misfortunes lately. The Oriental Bluebird, the refueling vessel that would go down to the Antarctic lost its registration and Panamá flag and is now registered in Japan requiring more staff and funds etc.”

Now it seems that my thoughts were not so astray.

The eminent change it is not only due to crisis, but to a number of given situations lead by it. Political change in Japan itself; shortly after taking office last October the Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama confide his dislike for whale meat saying that “I hate whale meat”.

Even thou the government at the time was showing no signs of discontinue the policy followed by his antecedents; buttressing up an unnecessary, unsustainable and uneconomic industry that has no place in the 21st century, now things seem to be changing.

IFAW was also focusing efforts inside Japan and with other NGOs such as Greenpeace urged the new Prime Minister to rethink about Japan stance on whaling and its national fleet.

The end of whaling in the southern ocean seems a possible reality now! I have withstand long conversations with Milko Schvartzman from Greenpeace International, and his belief was that if we are to save whales, the frontline of resistance must be inside Japan, our activism our efforts must come from within. Us on the outside are like little helpers, and can do just up to some point. My dear friend Sidney Holt also shared that vision; he always says that whaling has to be so economically unbearable that it is abandoned.

Now it seems that crisis will also affect whaling. We hope!

Information arrived to me via the Greenpeace International website with the topic: End of Japanese whaling might be in sight.

Japanese Whaling Fleet

On it you can read:

“A major review of Japanese government spending could spell the end to whaling in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary.

Commissioned to cut wasteful programmes by Japan’s new government, a review committee has proposed massive cuts in subsidies to a body which funds the so-called whaling research programme.

Without government subsidies, the whaling programme would be doomed.

The Spending Review Committee recommended that the Overseas Fisheries Cooperation Fund (OFCF), which gives loans to the Institute for Cetacean Research (ICR) to run the discredited science programme, have all of its funding revoked, except monies needed for loans in 2010.

The OFCF claims it needs 70.4 billion yen (around US$780 million) for various programmes, including whaling, in 2010. The Review Committee and Cabinet Office will determine by early next year if the proposed operations for 2010 are actually “necessary” or should also be cut.

The Institute for Cetacean Research, which runs the whaling programme, has failed to repay government loans for several years now, as demand for whale meat has plummeted and the cost of whaling increased. Practises which would have lead to bankruptcy for any commercial firm have been the target of outspoken criticism not only from Greenpeace Japan, but from the business press and even the former spokesperson for the Japanese Foreign Ministry, Tomohiko Taniguchi. Taniguchi lamented the financial propping up of a programme that caused endless headaches for Tokyo abroad and generated revenues worth “less than one-tenth the value of the country’s annual market for toothbrushes.”

With the change in government at the recent election, a new focus on reducing  spending and cutting wasteful programmes.

Two Greenpeace activists, Junichi Sato and Toru Suzuki, have spoken out against the cost of the whaling programme and the fact that only a handful of fat-cat bureaucrats really profit from the programme. Last year alone it cost 8 billion yen, or nearly US$90 million, to run the annual Southern Ocean whale hunt. Of that, 1.2 billion yen, or more than US$10 million, came from government subsidies. The rest is in theory covered by the sales of whale meat.”

Japan Whaling Ships

Still I’m not 100% convinced and I’m afraid that what Japan does is to resize their fleet, keep its recruited countries in sufficient number to take away a 75% majority to the pro-whale bloc inside the IWC thus preventing them from taking resolutions to vote that are binding; and keep on whaling. Other perspective if for Japan to hold its status as it is until the Small Working Group (SWG) negotiations are finished, and accomplish its goals and face-saving.

But I’m optimistic; the actions lead by Junichi and Toru had a big impact, not only in the media but also, because there was some tight control over meat coming from the Antarctic, some Japanese whalers stopped from going boarding for the Antarctic whaling season. Because, without the extra money they were making from meat they kept for free, after returning from the Antarctic, it was not worth to embark on that voyage. For this reason Japan had to start hiring and training whalers from Korea and other countries of Southeast Asia, making whaling even more expensive. Also the toll they get with their recruiting programme in order to have enough support inside the IWC and control roughly 50% of votes is so big that I wonder until when can it keep up, with an industry that doesn’t contribute to the Japanese economy health, and in fact it is a drag and forces Japan to spend taxpayers’ money, rather than making profit.

Now we need to keep up with our work, in my opinion we should even direct more actions and efforts inside Japan, and watch as a economical crisis and the necessity of cuts on public spending, take whalers from the southern ocean sanctuary forever, as it should be!

TIA, bru!

0035 of the 04/04/200 I was sitting at the 25A seat of the STP Airways taking off to Sao Tome (ST). I don’t understand why they feed us 2 courses within 5 hours when we are flying over night and what I really wanted to do was SLEEP, NOT EAT!

Landed ST at 0634 with people at the side of the landing platform waving at us and some dogs running around the track…

With much less sleep than what I need, and when I don’t get the sleep I nee I get very, VERY grumpy and stressed. So, I kept blaring inwards because the cue was taking too long, people were just taking silly photos and not moving etc.

At the vaccination pitch I met the always smiling Isaura Carvalho (the main organizer of the event) and her husband José Carlos Silva (a very famous chef) that helped us getting ready for the hotel.

At the way out I met Luis Noronha my long friend and guide of ST. After a small chat about life and how is ST going and the people that I know here we parted ways and I went o the new Pestana Sao Tome – Ocean Resort Hotel. Helping me up to my room as the nice Adécio, whom I’ve met the other 2 previous times I was here. He didn’t recognized me wt short hair (contrary to the long haired guy who was here the last time) and so I started to play him around saying he looked like someone from Sporting (a Portuguese football team), knowing that he is absolutely crazy about it and coaches a team of young kids here in the island.
I generally don’t fancy much this 5 start luxurious facilities with people more grumpy people than me with little sleep (normally I’m a nice chap!). However I must say that with the view I have from by balcony overseeing the ocean and a big part of ST’s coastline, this must be the best “office” I ever had (the balcony has internet access and all). I would however, maybe, change this for the Roça São João dos Angolares and its entire traditional and tropical feel. I Know I’m just taking the piss being so picky…

Pestana Hotel

After a short while I headed down to the hall, got on the mini-bus and entered the meeting at Aula Magna near the MARAPA office. All morning session I was struggling to keep my eyes open and gutted at the fact I could not get my hands on a cup of coffee, which I eventually did at the break of the meeting. Morning session was a full one with very interesting presentations. However I would like to mention 2 of them, the ones I caught all my half sleeping attention:

1)      The talk given by Rogério Roque Amaro (ISCTE):
Is the local development wanted and possible in STP?

I particularly liked the way he started addressing the people in the room by saying that he normally does not follow protocol and would like to greet every person present in the room in the same way (while others were giving praise to different people in relation to their social status).

He started by explaining the history of the concept and methodology of the “local development” movement, as it started to be put in practice by member of UN & FAO, even contrary to the models and practices of those organizations. Normally the ways of a more developed country, nation or society were modeled and then taken to another part of the world and imposed onto the population living there, because it was more evolved, and so it would enhance the standards of living of those striving and leading their lives there. However, one needs to listen and take into deep consideration the culture, ways, convictions and traditions of the populations of a community. One needs to listen and work with the community in a different way. Listen to them, use local methods and knowledge and look at the problems in a global perspective.

The main notion of “local development” is to find local answers for global challenges.

It is also an answer to the global crisis we are living presently, and to any problem that might arise and become a threat to the community.

So 3 sectors of society play a vital role on the process, the government as a partner of the process, the industry with a civil responsibility, and the community (not a administrative term here!) as a voiced entity that conducts its own path.

I took some quotes about “local development” that I think portrait its meaning:
-          “it is not a prête-à-porté kind of work”
-          “needs external help [but is not dependent of it] and it is not sectored”
-          “convert a person with problem into a person with capabilities”
-          “the local community is marginalized with the thought that was comes from abroad is what is good”
-          “defy the local government as a cabalistic agent rather that a inhibitor of development”

During the discussion the governor of the region of Principe (the other island) spoke and I thought his comment was very enthusiastic and with a good message: “we have to forbid of letting ourselves down, and never to doubt the power the communities have to organize.”

2)      The lecture presented by Maria do Carmo SIlveira (STP)
Sustainable/Local Development – durable perspective of the communities’ growth

I liked her presentation not so much for the edge revelations she presented but because of the contents related to STP. She presented only 4 dimensions of sustainable development when there are 7 and there were some gaps of knowledge. However, her presentation was simple and informative in relation to the palce we are meeting, Sao Tome and Principe.

She gave much focused on the environment as a fundamental factor for the sustainable development, having technology playing it role.

She also highlighted some projects that have environmental risks such as the petroleum case (that STP divided 40/60 with Nigeria) [that is was thought to save STP and making it a new Dubai, but so far nothing has happened so far], the deep water harbor, and in the end she threw the question to the air, “what kind of tourism do we want for STP?”

1st International Encounter on Local Development

After the morning session I started to collapse due to sleep deprivayion, so I headed to the hotel and slept almost all afternoon. Got up to eat at the hotel and went back to bed.

However, I would like to make some considerations in relation to the history of this small island state. After the 500 years of Portuguese dominance, in 1975 they got their independence.  With independence they were given a system, industries and a political realm they did not know how to administrate. To make things worse their transition was into a single party (dictatorship) who ruled the country and was taking any opposition to its power out of the way for 15 years. “Democracy” arrived only in 1990′s. Democracy with the less transparent budget in the world, according to the Open Budget Index (2008). Now go figure how is to work down here, it isn’t easy, many games of seduction and power, a little like the International Whaling Commission (IWC).

The country here is unstable and corruption is a career not opportunity. I reckon the main problem is that they are holding a system they don’t know how to control and administrate. The culture and society is still living in a post-traumatic state with little conducting vector towards a stable and safeguard environment for the people of STP.

TIA (This Is Africa), bru!

The road back to Africa

Tomorrow I’m heading to the small island state of São Tome and Principe, lying 150 miles (240 km) from the West African mainland.
There it will take place the 1st International Encounter on Local Development. I’m to give a lecture on whale-watching, and its perspectives on country, giving examples and making considerations in relation to the industry itself, its benefits to the coastal communities and sustainable ways of building a long lasting profitable industry based on conservation and research bases in order to achieve a consistence platform of work.

Fsheries of Sao Tome and Principe

Besides taking part on the event I’ll be having meetings with the decision-makers in government, representatives from the Civil Society (NGOs) and the tourism sector. The aim is to provide scientific and practical advice and suggestions regarding the use of cetaceans as a resource, and ways of implementing and cementing t – in accordance to the material also given in the presentation.

Considerations of the voyage to be displayed daily…

1º Encontro Internacional de Desenvolvimento Local

De 3 a 11 de Abril estarei de volta a São Tomé e Príncipe para tomar parte do 1º ENCONTRO INTERNACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO LOCAL (EIDL). Irei ministrar uma palestra com o título: Avistamento de Cetáceos prespectivado na realidade Santomense. Actividade esta que poderá ser muito benéfica para a comunidade costeira de STP tal como é para várias outras pequenas comunidades ao redor do globo. A palestra tomará uma abordagem global ao tema para depois ir convergindo para a realidade vivida em STP e a sua potencialidade para a prática desta actividade económica.

O 1º EIDL é um projecto da iniciativa da Associação ROÇAMUNDO em parceria com a FUNDAÇÃO CACAU, o Centro de Estudos Africanos (CEA/ISCTE), a Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa (UAL) , o Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade dos Açores (CES/UAC) e a Associação Internacional de Investigadores em Educação Ambiental (NEREA- Investiga).

1º Encontro Internacional para o Desenvolvimento Local (EIDL)

É objectivo deste projecto reunir em STP especialistas de diferentes áreas para reflectir sobre estratégias de desenvolvimento das comunidades locais a partir de uma realidade insular, com dificuldades evidentes em encontrar o melhor caminho para solucionar a progressiva pobreza em que se encontra mergulhado.

Várias políticas de desenvolvimento foram ensaiadas sem que alguma tivesse o efeito prático desejado, desafiando, deste modo, alguns conceitos e teorias de desenvolvimento económico. Neste contexto, a troca de experiências, tanto teórica como prática, na implementação e desenvolvimento de projectos comunitários promotores da mudança, poderá ser enriquecedora para os que têm estado empenhados em encontrar novos caminhos e soluções para romper as bolsas de pobreza.

Por outro lado, é fundamental promovermos e incentivarmos o desenvolvimento de uma cultura de parceria entre agentes nacionais e internacionais, entre o sector público e privado, o poder local e agentes económicos locais, constituindo, deste modo, uma

Comunidade de Prática como estratégia para a criação de mecanismos viáveis para o desenvolvimento.

Documentos de Interesse:
Projecto
Desdobrável
Ficha de Inscrição
Programa
Ateliers
Agenda Cultural

IWC Intersessional – Day 3

Sea Shepherd (SS) dominated all the agenda of the 3rd and last morning of the IWC Intersessional meeting. Japan via the Institute of Cetacean research (ICR) (who conducts  and runs the Japanese “junk-science” operations) presented a talk based on the “happenings” on the Southern Ocean during the last whaling season.

All their presentation was focused down on the ramming, the propellers disabling tactics and line-throwing rockets used by SS. In one of the videos they showed some one screaming. It was funny because they showed it like a way of demonstrating the danger and fear the crews of the catchers were experiencing but in the end he asked for no translation. Yeah it was someone screaming, but just swearing all the way through.

During their presentation they mentioned a few things that I got intrigued:
1) Japan’s claim that you were using nylon ropes to disable vessels and that after an unsuccessful attempt to do so, you would not recover the ropes
2) It also stated that if you were there to defend whales and then if some of their vessels was properly disabled it could eventually create a environmental catastrophe in the pristine region that is the Antarctic.

ICR presentation on Sea Shepherd

I took my time to ask Shannon Mann (long-time SS activist) about this 2 main question and she got me a nice and clarifying message. However, this is her perspective, not an official SS position!

[quoting Shannon Mann]
“But, in regards to your questions… we do use ropes to attempt prop fouling of the Japanese vessels, I’ve seen us try several times in the past three years. However, each situation is different and although we try to retrieve all of the lines we drop, there have been cases where we haven’t. If the situation is that we have to make the choice between doubling back to retrieving a line and abandoning the pursuit of the Nisshin Maru… we will stay on our pursuit of  factory ship and make sure no whales are being killed.  Essentially, if it comes directly down to the choice between whale life and a line, we choose the whale. As well, we often change course to pick up stray lines (and it happens often) when we are voyaging to and from the Antarctic territory.

So far we haven’t disabled one of the whaling ships with one of these lines.  I don’t know if we ever will, but I can assure you that we would do everything possible to mitigate the risk to their ship.  We would jeopardize our campaign and SS reputation if we caused injury, death or environmental destruction.  If the situation occurred where a ship was in need of assistance, obviously we would be there to ensure the ship and everyone on board was safe.  If they would refuse our help, they also have the rest of the fleet there to assist.

I’m not sure I’ve answered your questions, but feel free to email me again for further discussion.  As well, these are my opinions from my observations as a crew member for the past few years, not official SS stances… I would have to ask Paul for that, and could if you would like an official statement. [...]“

Sea Shepherd Logo

After my last lunch at the chaotic cafeteria on the 8th floor of the headquarters of FAO, I headed to the Santa Prisca hotel to pack up and leave. Seemed a easy task, but I always try to complicate it. I thought I had a long way to go and a few transfers in the way. My plan was to take the Metro, then the Train and reach Fiumicino Airport in time for my departure. After encountering some Greenpeace fundraisers on the street, they told me the best way of doing it was actually using the train station just next to the Metro near the Piramide. So I did, I shared the train with Alexandre de Lichtervelde, the Belgian IWC Commissioner and got far too early to the airport, so early the ladies at the check-in introduced me into an earlier flight. The only problem was that I didn’t really looked at my ticket and my only objective was to send away my luggage. So I watched all the people from the departure lounge boarding the plane I was meant to take. Because I was earring my mp3 player I did noticed any of the 20 times the name Francisco Gonçalves “last call, boarding etc” was pronounced. So I made a plane get delayed since all my luggage had to be taken of the aircraft and I got another tour of the airport getting my luggage back, making the check-in again and having the flight attendants eager to almost punch me, but in the end they we very sweet. After a short stop in Madrid I reached Lisbon Airport where my good friend Susana picked me up and we went down town for a few drink and cheap chat.

So the IWC Intersessional 2009 meeting was concluded.

Read the IFAW press release at the conclusion of the 3-day meeting: Whaling Commission harpoons science in favour of political compromise

IWC Intersessional – Day 2

Second day of proceedings started with the discussions of the Agenda Item 4: REPORT OF THE INTERSESSIONAL CORRESPONDENCE GROUP (ICG) ON ISSUES RELATED TO THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE (SC).

A panoply of affairs related to the SC presented by Greg Donovan, Countries started asking the Commission to be able to provide reports of the SC well before the IWC plenary. The current way things are processed; the Scientific Report is concluded and handed to the country delegations 48 hours prior and remains confidential until the plenary opening. Various countries argued that this manner is highly unproductive since the delegations cannot go through the approximately 800 pages in the time frame allowed and aren’t able to deliver recommendations and propose solutions. The commission will take this in consideration and will see what can be done to alter this.

Then discussions turned to the transparency and who should or shouldn’t be allowed presence at the SC meetings and so on. Australia did hold a stance wanting to be present at some of the SC discussions (and it was not allowed at some point), USA intervened saying that it welcomes observers, but there should be the opportunity for closed meetings of the procedure reviews and there is no plan on holding observers “because you don’t know how many will turn up if 4 or 84″ those were the words.

After Agenda Item 4 was closed opportunity was given to NGOs to speak. From all those I would like to sand out Dr. Sidney Holt’s speech, that you can access here. Talking about the crisis IWC faced, first in 1961 then 1973 he said that “We did learn, then, that short-term provisional “solutions” could lead to nasty long-term consequences”, referring to the almost extinction of blue, fin and humpback whales. “What crisis management really needed was for governments to have the will to change and to act in good faith. But promises to act definitively within a certain specified frame were repeatedly broken”. Whales indeed have a special status being highly migratory. Sidney evoked UNCLOS (Convention on the Law of the Sea) stating that fisheries must be managed in such way as to leave enough food for dependent species, such as cetaceans – not the other way around (Article 61.4 & 199.1 (b).

He also argued that the restoration of functionality requires the withdrawal of all “objections”". Another threat to Cetacean conservation is the “reservations” to CITES Appendix I listing. He finally welcomed the launching of the Southern Ocean research Partnership by the government of Australia, but said that was “a late start in producing a coherent management plan for the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary”.

Working Team

After the NGO speakers finalized their interventions, the commission went into recess until the next morning and we warped it up by lunch time.

However I would like to make some personal considerations about some of the agenda items and a few topics that are quite hot on the IWC dealings.

1) Everyone is asking for the head of the current chair of the IWC Dr. William Hogarth due to the “whalergate case” (as Patrick Ramage was putting it). Basically Dr. Hogarth was forging a plan behind close-doors that would legitimize whaling on international waters compromising the conservation block and fundamentally the welfare of whales by undoing the global moratorium on commercial whaling. See IFAW press release here.
Even though I would like to see Dr. Hogarth pulled away from the Chair role of the IWC I would agree with the IFAW perspective that it wouldn’t be good policy or tactic. Being a USA Chair to remove him from his position would be highly damaging. If there is any country able to put a final mark on the whaling issue is the USA. And their citizens need a feeling of leadership, get rid of Dr. Hogarth would not just take the “savior complex” away but would also leave the feeling that “if we are not leading, it is not our problem, the other leader have to solve it not US!”

2) Coastal Whaling
As for many other terms the ICRW is not clear in defining Coastal Whaling. Dr. Sidney Holt put it very well on his Speech saying that “[the term] is dangerously ambiguous. Colloquially it means “near the shore”, but some governments seem to think it could mean “within 200-miles or even further”. That’s practically what Aristotle called a reduction ad absurdum, making whaling habit from the Barent Sea to the coast of Labrador the zone of “coastal whaling”. Further confusion comes from something called “Small-Type Whaling” (S-TCW), which is just an English translation of a Japanese administrative category by which catchers of less than 48 tons displacement are allowed to hunt small whales on one-day trips, that’s about 50 miles from base”
I really think this Coastal Whaling terminology need to be clarified in order for us to envisage what we are really dealing here with.

3) Junk-Science
JARPA (conducted in the Antarctic), JARPN (conducted on the north-west Pacific); the ongoing JARPA II and JARPN II are all part of the so-called scientific programs of the Japanese government conducted by the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR), a privately-owned, non-profit institution. The institute receives its funding from government subsidies and Kyodo Senpaku, which handles processing and marketing of byproducts such as whale meat.

During JARPA for example, a program that took 18 years and after killing 6,778 minke whales it was attempted to determine the natural mortality rate, ‘M’.
In 2006 an expert workshop of scientists from the International Whaling Commission, meeting in Tokyo, agreed (including the Japanese scientists) that the natural mortality rate was not determined – the confidence limits around estimates of M from JARPA data were so wide that M remains effectively unknown. These were so wide that even a value of M=0 was not excluded. In other words, 18 years of lethal ‘research’ had been unable to exclude the possibility that minke whales might be immortal! (source: Greenpeace)

Today again we heard the IWC Head of Science Greg Donovan, say that there is not enough and reliable data to determine numbers and abundance of most of whale stocks, so I wonder after all this junk-science we still don’t have data to implement a RMP or anything at all? With over 200 scientists attending the SC meeting and so on producing huge amount of paper load to be analyzed 48 hours prior to the plenary opening, I ask: what have been the achievements of the SC?

4) The blurry fuzzy future
It is hard to make long-term strategies on this whaling affair. Most of the time, I feel we are only trying to fill in the holes, that the Japanese Government inflicts on the conservation movement. I strongly believe that the Small Working Group (SWG) has to be “blown-up”. It is circumventing the RMP (Revised Management Procedure), set in place (however, not applied) to make sure commercial whaling would be bond within safe and sustainable catch-limits based on sound-science. Now, the SWG is trying to come up with a package based on ad-hoc catch-limits, disregarding science and long-term sustainability all of this with an aura of compromise from the USA regarding Japan’s objectives.

Well, what are the Japanese objectives; anyone has any idea of what are these? If there is someone with a better and clearer idea is the USA government. We on the NGO platform are often blind-working trying to up-hold the conservation measures that the IWC imposed itself and is now thwarting, like the RMP and the Moratorium on Commercial Whaling.

Japan is still using its corruption loophole, here in Rome, Comoros was presented as an observer, obviously ready to join the circus of puppets Japan has bought in order to keep its simple majority, and the stalemate in place.

My work from now will be focused on avoiding some nations to join the IWC and support Japan, try to get one or two important countries and make sure they vote for conservation (if need be). Regarding the IWC 61 in Madeira I’ll be taking care of logistics and on-ground assistance; outreach network and information sharing coordination with NGOs and Civil Society; and work/provide information to Portuguese and International Media agencies based in Lisbon.

My feeling is that I’m just closing gaps and now making any dashing forward movements towards a resolution of the whaling issue.

The afternoon was spent walking around Rome, a long awaited moment since all my school days I was fascinated by Greek and Roman history. I walked a few kilometers around the city to discover things as I was going along, Coliseum, Arc of Triumph, roman Forum, Imperial Forum, Plaza de Venezia, Fontana de Trevi, Pantheon and other few bits.

Arco di Constantino

At the end of my walkabout I joined a Tibetan Demo marking the 50th anniversary of the exile of the Dalai Lama in Dharmsala, India. March 10th marks the 50th anniversary of the failed Tibetan uprising against Chinese rule that sent the Dalai Lama into exile.

Tibetan Monk

Dinner was at Da Giggetto, with Sidney, Vassili, Patrick, Georgan, and John, nice Roman meal to conclude the day.

IWC Intersessional – Day 1

It was a night with little sleep (about 3 hours) before I drove into Lisbon and my friend Susana took me to the airport. With a stopover in Madrid I got into Rome Fiumicino Airport around 19:00. Then took a taxi to the Hotel Santa Prisca where I’m staying. Dropped things there and went out for some food since the only thing I had eaten all day as breakfast, chose the closest one to the hotel, Trattoria “Perilli”. It was a strange experience since I do not speak Italian and didn’t know that you need to ask “all you want” on your plate separately so I ended up eating a Bisteca Manzo, that was nothing but a huge steak, followed by a Tiramisu. Went back to the hotel and dropped flat for some sleep.

It is difficult for me to get some decent sleep in cities, since I’m living on a very secluded place in the country side. So I spent the night waking up intermittently, and drinking loads of water due to the bedroom eating system that seems to dehydrate and try to take away all available water in my system.

Woke up today to get lost trying to find my way to the FAO headquarters, I started walking on the opposite direction, then manage to give myself a tour around before started ascending on the right direction through Via Piramide Ciesta and then Viale Aventino, until I reached Viale Terme Di Caracalla and the FAO headquarters.

FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy

Got my IFAW credentials and headed towards the venue. It seemed rather empty, but that was only because all NGOs were gathered at the cafeteria and I didn’t know about it! But soon people started to appear here and there, one of the very first I saw was Mammadou Diallo from WWF WARMER and dear colleague who has been giving a great help on my work in Africa, also after that I saw my dearest friend and mentor, Dr. Sidney Holt and my “PEW Boss” Leslie Busby. It was followed by many other included the other from the IFAW pack, Vassili Papastavrou and “IFAW Boss” Patrick Ramage.

The Red Room @ FAO Headquearters in Rome, Italy

All meeting was quite dull and we are not suppose to transmit whatever was said because it is confidential (quite ridiculous), we basically passed in review the 33 items the Small Working Group (SWG) has in hands following some comment on the future of the IWC by the Chairs; and that was the end of the first day. (read the “de Soto report” here)

After that we went down for dinner after the reception hosted by the Italian Government at the FAO headquarters where food and beverages were serve, we ended up in the same room that the Japanese Delegation having with us Sidney holt who appear on ECO calling them “Terrorists” and “Kidnapers”. Quite funny! After that I went down to my hotel and dropped dead at my small bed with a huge pillow :-)

PEW meeting + IWC scandal

Last Friday I met with Alex Garcia, an associate of the Varda Group that is organizing the PEW meeting in Lisbon, and I’ve passed from an invited observer to a local coordinator. Nice! The PEW meeting comes in a time where much discussion is abide related to the IWC and I belive it will be interesting, they will also try to congregate the Portuguese NGOs in a room and hopefully engage them into the IWC affairs!

Scandal within the IWC in again on top of the table…
“Apparently” (IFAW and I have been saying this since the IWC meeting in Chile on last July) the Bush Administration is trying to reach a deal with the Japanese to solve all the whaling issue. (We also start the meeting saying other things that turned almost everyone against us but in the end of the meeting many press releases came out saying what we badgering all along!)

hogarth.jpg

Washington Post story about the attempts to craft a deal
IFAW’s press release on the secret Bush’s administration plan to legitimise Japanese whaling

NGOs are now asking President Obama to cancel all negotiations regarding this “coup d’état”.
Read Greenpeace pledge to President Obama to assert authority and replace officials

I keep saying that this year things will get very interesting, the only down side seems to be me stuffed down on a suit and tie … funny!

And if the crisis would solve the whaling issue?

The other day I was talking to my dear friend and Guru, Sidney Holt, about this world economical crisis and if it would have any impact on the whaling scene as we know it. It is almost certain that good faith, politics, conservation policies, and lobbying alone will not turn the tide; the economical aspect of it all will be the decisive feature. As of now we cannot really forecast what will happen, but wondering about it, the fuel prices will fell dramatically, the Japanese whaling industry and hardware is getting old and they been having repeated misfortunes lately. The Oriental Bluebird, the refueling vessel that would go down to the Antarctic lost its registration and Panamá flag and is now registered in Japan requiring more staff and funds etc.

sibil.jpg

What would be the decisions of the Japanese to the future, go forward and build the new factory ship, which will drown us on a few more years of negotiations and political battles on the stalemate state that the IWC is at the moment… we don’t know.
What do the Japanese really want of this entire circus, do we even know? It is obvious that most of the reasons they present are total bogus … so what now?

But the question I’m maybe more interested in finding out is what will the Obama Administration do? Will they uphold all the negotiations done by Hogarth? Will they change all of it upside down? It will be interesting to see!