Chile & IWC 2009

Frenetic, stressful, inflammatory debates and very unproductive, the old same! This was the ambience surrounding the 60th Meeting of the International Whaling Commission, (IWC) hosted by the Government of Chile and held at Santiago.
After several decades of little change in terms of making the IWC a body that regulates properly whaling, it is sliding off to the middle ages framework. This because now (and like the UN) the IWC has a “mini-commission” that decides (by consensus) what goes around on the main venue, and so controls topics and themes that are “allowed” to e discussed. Preventing the other members of having an active and demanding stance inside the Commission itself.
It is my belief that this mini-commission is not going anywhere and should be dismantled during the next couple of meetings. However it is undermining all the work environmentalist and conservative government have done so far. Even those government are being blunt on their position. And worst of all the NGOs are giving out “votes of confidence” to governments who are betraying them and they keep supporting them. Some NGOs (big ones) even are saying one thing to the press and other inside the room. I must say i was very pleased to be representing the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) in Chile, whose position was the same throughout the meeting, it had the vision and clarity to see what was going behind the scenes and made accurate and precise conclusions about the outcome.

60th IWC meeting at Sheraton San Cristobal, Santiago of Chile

In sum the 60th meeting of the IWC was highly armful to whales, the so much hoped Southern Atlantic Sanctuary was not even proposed and all conservation work stopped. Who really won was Japan that didn’t gave any sign of good faith, keep their “junk-science” research in the Southern Ocean and took hard measures to prevent a transparent and democratic system inside the IWC (it might as well have won the secret ballot vote that it has been trying for years now).

As IFAW stated on its press released, “we didn’t ask fopr voting to stop, the only thing we want to see stopped is whaling!”

It will be interesting so see how things go in Madeira next year, where I’ll have much work on my shoulders to do and my only hope is that I may deliver good results.

Bolivian Passport

History especially…. That’s the topic I most like to read before departing to a new trip. This time I’m going back to South America; and why history? I like to go back in space and revive the birth of nations that allows to a better understanding of the current society. However, I also like to get some knowledge about the current trends and what some interesting places to visit.
This time I’ll be landing Buenos Aires on the 15th of June and head towards Montevideo (Uruguay) straight away, and have a week of vacations there. Then on the 21st I’ll be flying to Santiago (Chile) for the annual meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) as a representative of the International Fund for animal Welfare (IFAW), and will be returning to Buenos Aires for some time in Argentina, returning home on the 6th of July.

But reading here and there and looking out for visa specifications I stumble on an article from the New Internationalist website about Bolivia, quite astonishing!

And did you know that …
Bolivians seeking tourist entry to the US have the pleasure of completing the following steps:
1 Pay $110 (twice the monthly minimum wage) for the honour of submitting a visa application and seeking an interview at the US Embassy in La Paz.
2 Wait (usually months) for your interview to be scheduled.
3 Travel to La Paz and wait in a long line in Arctic-like morning weather outside the fortress-like, white US Embassy.
4 Approach the first window and have your paperwork reviewed (including all kinds of personal economic information, such as bank statements and employment letters). Have a good chance of being turned away right then for completing incorrectly the confusing, English-only forms.
5 Advance to a second window for questioning about your intentions. You might chat through the thick glass window with someone who is friendly, or with an official who seems interested in turning surliness into a fine art.
6 Stand a 90-per-cent chance of being denied (no refund of the $110 you paid the US Government for the experience).

Read more here